Symposium examines global economic growth
Global economic growth was the focus of a symposium hosted by Farm Foundation’s Food and Agricultural Trade Resource Center and the Clayton Yeutter Institute of International Trade and Finance at the University of Nebraska, Lincoln. The June 4, 2019 symposium, Global Economic Growth and Agricultural Trade: Prospects, Policies and Perspectives, took place at the Graduate Hotel, Lincoln, NE.
Providing introductions for the symposium were: Brad Lubben, Extension Associate Professor and Policy Specialist, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, and Board of Directors, Farm Foundation; and Matthew Schaefer, Veronica A. Haggart and Charles R. Work Professor of International Trade Law and Co-Director of Space, Cyber, and Telecom Law Program, University of Nebraska, Lincoln College of Law.
Luke Chandler, Chief Economist at Deere and Company, was the keynote speaker. Megan Provost, Vice President of Policy and Programs at Farm Foundation, moderated the panel discussion that followed. Panelists were:
- Richard Crowder, former U.S. Chief Agricultural Negotiator, and Professor and Thornhill Endowed Chair in Agricultural Trade, Virginia Tech University.
- Darci Vetter, former U.S. Chief Agricultural Negotiator, and Global Lead, Public Affairs, and Vice Chair for Agriculture and Food, Edelman-Washington.
- John Beghin, Michael Yanney Chair of International Trade and Finance at the Clayton Yeutter Institute of International Trade and Finance, and Chair of the Department of Agricultural Economics at the University of Nebraska, Lincoln.
Agricultural Trade in a Time of Uncertainty
More than 130 people participated in the Farm Foundation Food and Agricultural Trade Resource Center’s first trade conference, Agricultural Trade in a Time of Uncertainty. The April 30, 2019, conference was at the Doubletree Hotel, Arlington, VA
The keynote speaker opening the conference via video was Roberto Azevedo, Director-General of the World Trade Organization (WTO). His presentation was followed by a panel discussion of the WTO, including its dispute settlement process, its approach to developing countries, and its overall future. The first presenter was Ambassador Alan Wolff, Deputy Director General of the of the WTO. A text of his presentation is available here. The other panelists were Chad Bown, Ph.D., Reginald Jones Senior Fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, and Evan Rogerson of Nanyang Technological University, formerly the Director of the Agriculture and Commodities Division of the GATT. (Balancing Rights and Obligations in the WTO: A Shared Responsibility, is the report Mr. Rogerson referenced in his comments.)
Participating in a panel that discussed free trade agreements were John Weekes, Senior Business Advisor with Bennett Jones LLC, Ottawa, Canada (Powerpoint); Nick von Westenholz, Director of EU Exit and International Trade for Britain’s National Farmers Union; and Bruce Hirsh, Principal and Founder of Tailwind Global Strategies.
Discussing the geopolitical landscape was David Goldman, Ph.D., author for Asia Times and PJ Media (Powerpoint).
The impacts of trade wars and retaliation was the topic of discussion for a panel that included Pete Kappelman, Senior Vice President of Member and Government Relations at Land O’Lakes (Powerpoint); Dan Kowalski, Vice President of the Knowledge Exchange Division of CoBank (Powerpoint); and Joanna Lidback, a Vermont dairy farmer, a business consultant with Yankee Farm Credit and member of the Global Farmer Network (Powerpoint).
Discussing the sanitary and phytosanitary trade challenges that are and could impact the U.S. food and agricultural sector were Bill Bryant, founder and chairman of Bryant Christie, Inc.; Karen Stuck, a consultant specializing in issues involving Codex Alimentarius and international food trade (Powerpoint); and Daniella Taveau, a regulatory and global trade strategist and founder of Bold Text Strategies.
Closing the conference was a session on the U.S. government approach to food and agricultural trade. Speakers for this session were Under Secretary Ted McKinney, U.S. Department of Agriculture and Ambassador Gregg Doud, Chief Agricultural Negotiator with the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative. (The European Court of Auditors 2018 report Ambassador Doud referenced during his comments is: Transparency of EU funds implemented by NGOs: more effort needed.)
* * * * *
Analyses examine potential impacts of Trans-Pacific trade for U.S. and Canadian food & agriculture sectors
The U.S. food and agriculture sector is entering a very volatile period in international trade, during which it risks losing much of the trade gains achieved over the past three decades. But, if the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) is approved, if the current trade war ends, and if the United States rejoins the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), U.S. food and agriculture could see not only the gains of the past decades reinforced but could also realize the potential for additional trade gains. Meanwhile, the Canadian food and agriculture sector is set to take advantage of some of those potential losses.
Those are among the findings of two analyses released at the Farm Foundation Forum March 4, 2018, in Washington, D.C. The first analysis, completed by agricultural economists Maksym Chepeliev, Ph.D., Wallace E. Tyner, Ph.D., and Dominique van der Mensbrugghe, Ph.D., at Purdue University focused on How Differing Trade Policies May Impact U.S. Agriculture: The Potential Economic Impacts of TPP, USMCA and NAFTA. The second analysis, completed by Don Buckingham, Ph.D., and Al Mussell of the Canadian Agri-Food Policy Institute (CAPI), focused on The CPTPP and Benefits to Canadian Agriculture.
The Purdue analysis provides a quantitative assessment of the possible impacts on U.S. agriculture from different trade policy regimes in a volatile trade policy context. The assessment is based on the GTAP model, a standard tool in the arsenal of available tools in quantifying economics impacts of changes in trade policies. This paper is an extension of an analysis commissioned by Farm Foundation in October 2018. The analysis was expanded to examine additional and potential scenarios as events continue to evolve in the trade arena.
Even with the previously estimated $454 million in increased exports for U.S. farmers under the USMCA, the sector is still facing strong headwinds and the possibility of a significant loss of export revenues. According to this study, the United States’ withdrawal from the TPP and the subsequent implementation of the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP or TPP11) reduces U.S. food and agricultural exports by $1.8 billion a year. Following trade liberalization between the 11 remaining TPP members, there is an increase in trade within those countries, which substitutes away from U.S.-based imports and causes a corresponding loss in U.S. export markets. However, if the United States were to rejoin the original TPP, the agreement would significantly benefit U.S. farmers – the loss of $1.8 billion would turn into a gain of $2.9 billion in additional agricultural exports.
The Purdue economists also assessed the estimated impacts of some of the more protectionist trade policies the United States has implemented and could potentially implement in the future. One example was the imposition of tariffs on steel and aluminum and subsequent retaliatory tariffs implemented by key trading partners—in particular, Canada, China, the European Union and Mexico—will cause U.S. agricultural exports to decline by around $8.4 billion. Another potential scenario addressed in the analysis is a complete withdrawal from NAFTA, with tariffs reverting to MFN levels, which would create a decline in U.S. agricultural exports of more than $12 billion.
The combination of policies—U.S. withdrawal from TPP, global retaliatory tariffs, and if the United States were to entirely withdraw from NAFTA—would realize a potential a drop in U.S. agricultural exports of $21.8 billion. These negative trade impacts would be reflected in lower incomes for U.S. farmers, reduced agricultural land returns and farm labor displacement.
On the other hand, the CAPI study illustrates how these losses (and potential losses) to the U.S. food and agriculture sector stand to benefit Canadian farmers. The main segments of the Canadian food and agriculture sector set to benefit under the CPTPP are the pork, beef and wheat markets in Japan. As the United States is the key competitor in these Japanese markets, its exclusion from the new CPTPP stand to benefit Canadian farmers. Overall, the study shares estimates that agri-food sales from Canada are expected to rise by a total of Can $1.84 billion/U.S. $1.38 billion. The study also recognizes that some of the new market access allowed under both the USMCA and CPTPP could be “damaging to Canada’s supply managed industries, but not fatal.”
Review the full analyses:
How Differing Trade Policies May Impact U.S. Agriculture: The Potential Economic Impacts of TPP, USMCA and NAFTA, by Purdue University economists Maksym Chepeliev, Ph.D.; Wallace E. Tyner, Ph.D.; and Dominique van der Mensbrugghe, Ph.D.
The CPTPP and Benefits to Canadian Agriculture, by Don Buckingham, Ph.D., and Al Mussell, the Canadian Agri-Food Policy Institute.
Review the October 2018 analysis: How U.S. Agriculture Will Fare Under the USMCA and Retaliatory Tariffs, commissioned by Farm Foundation and completed by Purdue University.